Dual Processes, Development, and Scalar Implicature

نویسندگان

  • Susan Scrafton
  • Aidan Feeney
چکیده

Dual process theories suggest that our thinking is determined by separate, but interacting, heuristic and analytic processes. We describe an experiment designed to investigate the development of these processes. We examined the extent to which groups of 6, 9, 12, and 15 year-old participants and a group of adults were sensitive to scalar implicature in pragmatically enriched and pragmatically impoverished contexts. For younger participants we find high rates of pragmatic responding in enriched contexts and high rates of logical responding in impoverished contexts. Early adolescents displayed universally pragmatic responding whilst logical responding re-emerged in older adolescents and adults. These results suggest that heuristic processes develop earlier than analytic processes but that they are not well developed until early adolescence.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

When some is not every: dissociating scalar implicature generation and mismatch.

Making inferences beyond the literal meaning of sentences occurs with certain scalar expressions via scalar implicatures. For example, adults usually interpret some as some but not all. On the basis of behavioral research, it has been suggested that processing implicatures is cognitively costly. However, many studies have used cases where sentences with some did not match the context in which t...

متن کامل

Ad-hoc scalar implicature in adults and children

Linguistic communication relies on pragmatic implicatures such as the inference that if “some students passed the test,” not all did. Yet young children perform poorly on tests of implicature, especially scalar implicatures using “some” and “all,” until quite late in development. We investigate the origins of scalar implicature using tasks in which the scale arises from real-world context rathe...

متن کامل

Processing scalar implicature: What can individual differences tell us?

There is much current debate about processing scalar implicature, but a considerable body of empirical evidence seems to support the idea that it requires additional time and effort on the part of the hearer (e.g. Breheny, Katsos and Williams 2005, Bott and Noveck 2004 and many others). The goal of this study was to contribute to our understanding of the cognitive processes that go on as compre...

متن کامل

Between “cost” and “default”: a new approach to Scalar Implicature

Scalar Implicatures are pragmatic inferences that are normally derived in conversational exchanges when a scalar term, such as for example “or”, is used. Different theoretical accounts have been proposed to describe how and at which point in the derivation we actually add this inference. Large part of the most recent debate is focused on the question of the “cost” of implicature computation, an...

متن کامل

Remarks on the Experimental Turn in the Study of Scalar Implicature, Part II

for Part I and Part II) There has been a recent ‘experimental turn’ in the study of scalar implicature, yielding important results concerning online processing and acquisition. This paper highlights some of these results and places them in the current theoretical context. We argue that there is sometimes a mismatch between theoretical and experimental studies, and we point out how some of these...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006